Thursday, September 17, 2009

what would Emily Post say?

Can someone tell me when it became acceptable to post a picture of your baby the second it has come out of you?

I am not even kidding.

I logged into Facebook the other day and one of my "friends" (maybe not much longer, I might be deleting her) had posted, as her status update, a picture of her baby right after it had been born. And I do mean right after. The baby had not been cleaned off and you could even see the mother's legs in the picture....propped up in the stirrups.

Disgusting.

6 comments:

Lin said...

Woah...thats a little too much. Gross.

(not that I dont like baby's, I do but just not as soon as they exit the whoo ha)

Passion Fruit said...

It definitely is over the top especially since the baby doesn't get a say in the matter. BUT as long as you don't do anything as such yourself.. why do you care?

Beth Dunn said...

That is a little "much" xo

SouthernBelleJM said...

Ummmmm, not okay. At least clean the baby up first and get out of the stirrups. Geez!

bARE-eYED sUN said...

*sheesh*

Facebook has certainly arrived!

:-(

waddaya gonna do? fuhgeddabowditt!

..
.ero

free dating said...

HAHAHAHAHA!!

You guys...hilarious!